This page is destined to be filled out by opinions and opinions picked up through the forum contained in this site or through e-mail. 

To seem of the father: 

  Through it analyzes her/it of the documents and pick up of opinions along these 12 years, I reach the conclusion that the process began badly from I begin him/it. The suspect never have been accuse of it neglects, but for premeditated crime, since he was son of the lordship and plenty indications and factos that proved attempts on the part of the lordship existed and of her children to dislodge us.
 
But most of the blame is going without doubt shade to the public prosecution service for several reasons:
 
1 - Same possessing the confession of the interrogated that had been him that was at the place and there he/she left the toxicant product, it promoted the arquivamento of the process. 

2 - It filed the process without, nor the victim nor your lawyer, they were notified of the facto and with that it burned a precious time that culminated with the amnistia. 
In my humble one optical, the more it doesn't go because it was treated of a human being life, the public prosecution service, unlike ordering to file, it should have ordered to investigate more thoroughly and to determine with exactidão the cause of the death of the dog.

Once they were not picked up proofs were not picked up for besides the declarations of the interrogated and being known that the declarations for him rendered in the process crime (filed to the shelter of the law of the amnistia) they were not been worth for the civil process, it was obvious the issue of that process.
 
Being was like this for the these 12 year-old end passed they are incalculable. Although it didn't repair my son's life, it could facilitate the cares that needs on time whole, the acquisition of technical helps and to alleviate the expenses of the family with special feeding, diapers and dislocations.

Mine to see two they exist accused by that facto: 

1 - The public prosecution service for the reasons already exposed. 

2 - Mr. Presidente Jorge Sampaio because he/she gave the amnistia that benefitted him interrogated. 

Summarizing. In the optical of a simple citizen but family father, the State should arch with that responsibility and indemnizar the family with base in the following I calculate: 

 (X–Y) x 12 years + lifelong pension 
- Being X the value despendido for utente interned in a center of rehabilitation of the State. 

- Being Y the value that despende actualmente the State with my son (I subsidize of disability + I subsidize of 3rd person).
 
- Being 12 years the time what my son meets in this state. 

- The lifelong pension should have for base it formulates her previous and to be he/she paid after the indemnização and until the end of my son's life.

 
      
Gondomar, October 31, 2003 

Neste espaço 

e

... colabore...